Watch

Watch TTN Tube TTN Music

Events

Browse Events My events

Article

Browse articles

Market

Latest Products TTN Shop

Pages

My Pages Liked Pages

More

Ministries TTN Ads Forum Explore Popular Posts Jobs Offers Fundings Analytics
Ministries Events Article My Pages Analytics See all
Chris Deweese
Chris Deweese  
46 w

Brothers and sisters, I've run across believers who have rejected Paul in the past 5 years. This almost always leads to the rejection of Yeshua as well and seems to be on the rise. This teaching is meant to counter that and equip the saints (you) with the knowledge necessary to counter this dangerous trend.

https://firstcenturychristiani....ty.net/the-apostle-p

The Apostle Paul - First Century Christianity
Favicon 
firstcenturychristianity.net

The Apostle Paul - First Century Christianity

Understanding the Apostle Paul and the doctrines that depend on his writings can take years of study. This message is a time saver.
avatar

Joe Pena

In my 25 years of ministry in the Hebrew Israelite community, I have seen dozens of people start by coming against the Most High's anointed in this case Shaul. Eventually, they end up denying not only Shaul but Messiah as well. The Most High gave us very specific warnings about doing that.
· Reply · 1702318192
avatar

GidgetsMom

Why would rejecting Paul lead to rejecting Yeshua? I've heard that accusation many times over the past 18 years. It's not logical. Paul added to Scripture and contradicted Scripture. Yeshua lived it perfectly, never contradicting or adding to it, but clarifying it after Paul's fellow pharisees muddled it.
· 1702318972
7 Replies
avatar

GidgetsMom

Having had Paul "explained" to me numerous times, all I can do is compare it to my experience with kaballah. It sounds great and I xget" it while I'm listening to the speaker, but when I go back to study it on my own, none of it makes sense and I cant figure out how the speaker came to those timey-whimey type explanations. Reuel made the most sense of anyone so far, although he neglected to address part of the issue, an oversight most likely. I did manage to make sense (on my own) of the portion that talks about there being no further sacrifice after one has sinned. Most say it means if you willfully sin, you were never truly saved. However, it is more plain that if you sin there is no further need for sacrifice, as Yeshua was the ultimate sacrifice for all sin. But, then you get into restoration of the temple...
· 1702331984
2 Replies
avatar

GidgetsMom

That is what I have done, basically: I have decided I don't have the capacity to understand Paul, but continue to look for the answers. I just have a brick wall against him, I guess. I don't view his letters as Scripture because even though Peter "called" them Scripture, that doesn't make sense . The catholics had a lot of fun with the cannon back in the first 4 centuries. I don't trust THEM to have not added or taken away from Scripture. When something doesn't fit with Torah, I figure that's where they changed something. There were other books not put in cannon, for good reason, but the ones included were heavily revised. I would much rather have someone find the book of the Law that was in the temple rubble, than try to guess which book it was. So much has been lost to history, it really saddens me. I don't believe the preacher's arguement that the Scriptures are in tact because they hold it in their hand. Men are fallible and men manipulate, just like satan does, so I question everything, and if there's no precident for it in Torah, I don't pay much attention to it.
· 1702391003
3 Replies
avatar

GidgetsMom

One reason I don't paul as Scripture is that Yah is not the author of confusion, satan is. Also, peter supposedly called pauls letters scripture while he was still alive..too early to have been tested properly to be called scripture. Pauls letters are incomplete. We dont know what the letters he was responding to contained. Out of context adds to the confusion. There really isnt anything paul says that is beneficial to understanding Yeshua or Torah. I know a lot of people will take offense to that, but the gospels and revelation explain everything because the refer back to the psalms and prophets and Torah. Paul is not a necessary element in understanding Scripture.
· 1702394794
1 Reply
avatar

Rhy Bezuidenhout

 
The video is a great summary of how Paul's teachings are embedded in what anyone who follows Yeshua and the Christians, Jesus, believe in that only Paul teached.

I don't want to spoil it by stating the points in the comments so that people should go watch your video. ?
· Reply · 1702398892
Latest Products See all