1 + 1 + 1 = 3

If someone is accused of not following the law and no witnesses are found against that person and then tells others to go do what they themselves did, is that person then telling them to go break the law?

If the accused then employes someone to go teach others what they have taught their employee, does the employee then go and teach others to break the law?

1 - Matt 26:59-60a "Now the chief priests and the whole Council (Sanhedrin, Jewish High Court) tried to get false witnesses to testify against Jesus, so that they might [have a reason to] put Him to death. They found none, even though many false witnesses came forward."

1 - Matt 28:20a "teaching them to observe everything that I have commanded you"

1 - Acts 9 then speaks of Saul meeting with Yeshua, but verses 15 & 16 is the crux of the message "But the Lord said to him, “Go, for this man is a [deliberately] chosen instrument of Mine, to bear My name before the Gentiles and kings and the sons of Israel; for I will make clear to him how much he must suffer and endure for My name’s sake.”

3 - Paul wouldn't have taugh against Yeshua (who taught Torah) as he was commissioned to spread the Good News of Yeshua being the Messiah.

My view is therefore if there is something that I read where it seems like Yeshua, Paul or any other writer is going against Torah then I need to dig deeper as the error is in my understanding of the writing.

This mindset is what got me out of modern-Christianity and the foundation of my understanding of what was taught in the New Testament.

#paul #paulsteachings