Thank You for Your Support – Let’s Shape TTN’s Future Together
First, I want to express my heartfelt gratitude to everyone who has already committed their support on the recent post (https://social.ttn.place/post/....51122_help-keep-ttn- Your contributions and encouragement have been invaluable, and it’s because of you that there’s now a promising path forward to keep TTN running in its current form.
However, to fully secure TTN’s future, I will need your continued involvement over the next six months to stabilize and grow the platform.
At this stage, we just need two more new Gold memberships to reach a sustainable level and I’ve also reached out to existing Gold members to confirm if they will continue their support and hope to hear back from them within the coming week. With these final 4 memberships confirmed, we will be over the hump.
A New Board Structure to Empower the Community
To make participation more engaging and meaningful, I’ve been considering a new structure for the TTN Board. This approach would give more influence to the community:
1. All paying members will automatically become part of the Board, allowing them to listen, provide feedback, and share their input on key matters.
2. Gold members and white-label site subscribers will gain voting rights on important decisions, such as new features, resource allocation, and policy changes.
This structure ensures that those who are truly committed to TTN will have a voice in shaping its future and the way it operates.
I would love to hear your thoughts on this proposal. Please share your feedback by voting or leaving a comment below. Together, we can ensure TTN continues to thrive as a platform for our community!
#ttnboard #votingrights
Rhy Bezuidenhout
So, we are hearly there. 🎉
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?
David Martin
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?
Rhy Bezuidenhout
My suggestion therefore is to still have the Pro members be part of a private Group where matters are raised and when needed, a vote is taken. But the final decision won't necessarily be what the majority has voted for, especially when it is a doctrinal matter that impacts the in/exclusion of a wider Torah audience.
How does that sound for a compromise to get more people involved in the direction TTN takes while still keeping the platform neutral?
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?