I've been considering doing a review website. I've hesitated with that because I know the potential of what people might do. We see reviews done in scripture by Paul who wrote about diotrephes who wanted to be first among the assembly which is taking preeminence which only belongs to Messiah. So there are times when warning the body is in order. I have to weigh in that and other factors to set standards. I don't know when or if I will actually get it implemented. Right now I'm transferring a bunch of domains to another server. I had so many domains on one server I didn't even have room to do backups. But I'm getting that done and the process will take some time so I'm just working on it a little bit every day.
TTN Music 
TTN Ads 
Rhy Bezuidenhout
If so, that would be quite a feat in my view as it would mean that the person doing the evaluation would not be allowed to project their own views/beliefs on the website being evaluated and at the same time be required to project their own views/beliefs on the website being evaluated. 😫
Being Switzerland while still taking a side. 😖
What criteria do you use to evaluate a site? It can't be doctrines as it differs radically in the community. Unless if you want a very niche review site that ringfences certain sites or if you want to be totally neutral and evaluate a site on a whole set of criteria like a checkbox exercise. But what if you misunderstand one of the doctrines and set the "checkbox" wrong?
Let's take the touchy subject of polygamy as an example. Do you "allow" such sites or not?
This is one of the reasons why I haven't formally launched the TTN Search site as I need to set a baseline of which sites to include; and it has to be an easy exercise as there are thousands of potential sites to include. As example, is simply mentioning Yeshua as Messiah or `Hebrew Roots` adequate to include a site???
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?