Abraham said, “I did it because I thought, ‘There is no fear of God at all in this place, and they will kill me because of my wife.’
Genesis 20:11 ESV
Most of Abraham’s experience in Canaan was near Sodom, and we know from the story of Dinah two generations later that the people of this region truly were wicked and were prone to treating people, especially visitors, as property to be taken, used, and traded at will.
Abimelech was probably looking for an alliance with Abraham, just as Shechem was with Jacob. If he had thought Sarah was Abraham’s wife, then there is a much better chance that he would have killed Abraham and taken his wife as a hostile takeover of Abraham’s domain, not simply as an act of sexual desire and violence.
Abraham trusted God that Sarah would be restored to him, but I think this still showed a lack of trust that God would also preserve his life. He couldn't become the father of nations if he was dead, but God had promised, so God would not have allowed Pharaoh or Abimelech to kill him.
Rhy Bezuidenhout
We see Abraham lying twice, Isaac doing the same and then Rachel lying about the spies that she hid. There is a common denominator in here as every time someone's life was in jeopardy which makes me wonder whether it is permitted to ly in such circumstances; even if it is just perceived danger. 🤔
But coming back to my thought, are we correct in thinking that bearing false witness (which has an impact on someone else's life) is the same a lying which normally has an impact on us directly?
Do you maybe have a thought on this?
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?
Jerry Mitchell
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?
Jerry Mitchell
The bottom line with the information I currently have is honesty is the best policy and there may be times when we should be prayerfully and constructively artistic when being honest. I hope that makes sense.
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?