Due to a serious medical issue in my family I’ve fallen way behind with recording these. I’ll be catching up to the weekly parasha over the next month.

On this date in history, 03/16/1777: The Battle of Ward's House near Kingsbridge, New York. #otd #tdih #amrev https://www.historycarper.com/....category/battles/ame

Trying a different type of Headcovering. Any other ladies convicted to cover randomly and not all the time? ??‍♀️ #headcovering

I know many of you enjoy these short daily thoughts and I really appreciate your input. I will be traveling for a few days, during that time I will try to keep up but it may be in a slightly different way. Due to time and possible internet connection issues, I may need to post at different times or in a different way. I will try to post on MeWe and on The Torah Network, please consider joining these social network platforms. Your prayers are appreciated as we trust the Creator to send us where He wants us to go. We will be looking for a new place to not only to call home but to continue this outreach. I might not know yet where it is, but I trust the Creator has already been making the arrangements for us.

While Tennant and Foster get a LOT right in this book, one glaring weakness is that they believe the 'church' is Yah's vehicle. In fact, 'ekklesia', often translated 'church' is better understood as 'assembly' and is the word Stephen uses in Acts 7:38 to describe kol Israel.

Nevertheless, B&T are right, there can be no restoration of Israel OR the world at large without a restoration of righteous patriarchy.

Biblical principle:
Remarriage of a divorced woman is adultery; nothing could be clearer in Scripture.
"Whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery." - Lu 16

This is indeed the reason why the exception for putting away an adulterous woman is not an exception to "let not man put asunder"; if they were asunder, then remarriage would be no different from marriage. Rather, the covenant continues, remarriage is adultery - putting away, for a righteous man, is an alternative to making the woman a public example.

"Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a publick example, was minded to put her away privily." - Mt 1

Only death dissolves the covenant of marriage, not "as good as dead", or "dead to me", or whatever excuse an adulterer wishes to make.

"Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man." - Ro 7

The divorced woman is bound by the law (this is a Torah community) so long as her husband lives. For the adultery of marrying a divorced woman there is one answer:

"Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God." - Ga 5