Question 124: Was Paul familiar with the Scriptures?
Answer:
It is made clear in Acts 27 that Paul was familiar with "all the learning of the Greeks." Tarsus his native city, was a famous seat of learning and philosophical research and he probably had the advantage of training in its schools. The son of a Pharisee and trained from boyhood to the pursuits of a doctor of Jewish Law, he presumably was instructed in the elements of Rabbinical lore, including of course the Jewish Scriptures. These are the inferences of those writers who have studied his life career. This could not apply to the New Testament writings as we now know them, for they were only in the making and must have been very incomplete; but it is a fair presumption that in his later career, as an apostle, he was not ignorant of such writings as may then have been in existence, dealing with the events of Yeshua' life and ministry. There was no New Testament, in the modern meaning of the term in Paul's day and could not have been, for obvious reasons.
Question 123: What Was the Cause of the Dispute Between Peter and Paul at Antioch?
Answer:
"When Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed," wrote Paul in Galatians 2:11. In view of this statement of Paul, some have questioned whether we may regard both Paul and Peter as having been acting under inspiration. The question of inspiration is not involved in the incident that took place at Antioch, when Paul rebuked Peter for his inconsistency. It is simply a question of human weakness. While under the influence of certain High Church Jewish-believers, who came from James, Peter withdrew and separated himself from the Antioch believers, "fearing them of the circumcision." The result was that Barnabas, and doubtless many others, were affected by his example, which became a scandal in the community. To save the Church from an apostasy, Paul took Peter to task for his conduct and rebuked him openly, as his conduct was an attack on Gospel liberty. The writings of Paul and Peter that have found their way into the New Testament Canon are beyond doubt inspired, but to say that every word they uttered during their faith lives was inspired is what we do not believe. Paul and Peter had human weaknesses and limitations, like other men. But when they wrote authoritatively under the guidance of Ruach HaKodesh, they were kept free from errors and mistakes and in this way were inspired.
Question 122: What do we know of Paul’s personal appearance?
Answer:
All we know of it from his own writings, is found in 2 Corinthians 10:10, which indicates that he did not possess the advantage of a distinguished or imposing presence. His stature was somewhat diminutive; his eyesight weak (see Acts 23:5 and Galatians 4:15) nor did he regard his address as impressive. Much of this personal criticism however, may have been the outcome of the apostle's desire to avoid magnifying himself or his own talents. A fourth century tablet represents him as venerable-looking and dignified with a high bald forehead, full-bearded and with features indicating force of character. One ancient writer says Paul's nose was strongly aquiline. All the early pictures and mosaics, as well as some of the early writers (among them Malalus and Nicephorus) agree in describing the apostle as of short stature, with long face, prominent eyebrows, clear complexion and a winning expression, the whole aspect being that of power and dignity. The oldest known portrait is the Roman panel of the fourth century, already referred to above.
Frequently asked questions and answers:
Question 121: Who were Paul’s parents?
Answer:
The name of Paul’s parents is not given in the Scriptures. The only mention of his blood relations is in Acts 23:16 and Romans 16:7, 11, but whether Andronicus, Junia and Herodion were really relatives or simply friends is an open question.