AI tarries where it does not belong: https://thekingdomnetwork.us/2....025/06/06/ai-and-dea
This evening, at 8:30pm CDT, is the premiere of our new Virtual Shabbat Gathering over on our YouTube channel! We hope to see you there! https://www.youtube.com/@TriumphInTruthMedia
Suddenly YHWH said to Moses and to Aaron and Miriam, “Come out, you three, to the tent of meeting.” And the three of them came out.
Numbers 12:4
"Suddenly" should be understood as "sharply". God addressed all three of them harshly, indicating that Aaron and Miriam were definitely in the wrong, but Moses must have contributed to the problem in some way. Maybe Moses was a little *too* meek in his leadership role.
This coming week, 15-21 June 2025 (19-25 Sivan 5785), the Bible reading plan covers Sh’lach L’cha (Send For Yourself).
https://thebarkingfox.com/2025..../06/13/weekly-bible-
This coming week, 15-21 June 2025 (19-25 Sivan 5785), the Bible reading plan covers Sh’lach L’cha (Send For Yourself).
https://thebarkingfox.com/2025..../06/13/weekly-bible-
Now the man Moses was very meek, more than all people who were on the face of the earth.
Numbers 12:3
Moses was a powerful man, but too humble to defend himself. He spoke out for others, but not for himself. That reminds me of #yeshua, who was falsely accused, but allowed himself to be convicted and executed for the crimes of the world.
Let's prep for Shabbat this evening!
"If a thief be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, no blood shall be shed for him.
But if the sun be risen upon him, blood shall be shed for him: for he should make full restitution: if he have nothing, then should he be sold for his theft."
Ex 22
TTN Music 
TTN Promo 
Henk Wouters
like show me everywhere in the text where the following 'summat' also occurs.
or, to what this article is tackling, do an analysis on this piece of physical evidence (those scrolls).
and yes, it's only as good as it was 'trained', but the boffins, if they've done their job will have brought it up to the current highest level of understanding on that subject.
and now it can work with its ace in the hole, it doesn't get tired or overlook a piece of info, it's a machine, mindless, and it does it superfast, before we get distracted by another butterfly...
regardless, it is showing an anomaly in the handwritings, and is coming to a conclusion based on what's been fed into it.
what i mean is otherwise some geek hidden in a cave on some island would have spent his whole life studying this, and revealed his labour with his dying breathe.
and then we wouldn't question his conclusion, at least in the same way we are questioning ai, something like that.
(and yet, i myself still don't use it...)
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?
raphaelmalachi
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?
Rhy Bezuidenhout
I can understand why they say "It is unknown who finished the Book of Daniel, but it would appear that the unknown author associated with these fragments did so in the early 160s B.C.E., according to the results from Enoch." as I have seen articles talking of Persian loan words which didn't exist in 650BC being used in the newest parts of the book. An AI would be able to pick that up very easily when it compares the data with other sources.
BUT like you said, it all depends on the data it has been trained on. If the initial dating of the other sources are incorrect then this dating will also be incorrect. A catch-22... 😖
The same thing happens in dating fossils. Rocks are dated according to the plant matter found in it and at the same time the plant matter is dated according to the rock it is found in. 🤔
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?