Question 92: Was Pharaoh drowned in the Red Sea?
Answer:
All the evidence is against the theory that he was drowned in the Red Sea. Some very interesting information, furnishing striking confirmation of the Bible narrative, has recently been obtained, by deciphering the inscriptions on ancient Egyptian monuments. From these it appears that the Pharaoh who "refused to let the people go" was named Menephthah. He was the youngest son of the great Pharaoh Rameses II, the Pharaoh who oppressed the Hebrews and ordered the killing of the male infants and whose death is mentioned in Exodus 2:23. Menephthah was an old man, at least sixty when he came to the throne and was constitutionally timid and feeble. He joined with him in the government his brilliant son Seti, a young man resembling in person and character his grandfather, the great Rameses. Seti was virtually king though his father Menephthah, was king in name. The Bible alludes to Seti as "the firstborn of Pharaoh who sat on the throne" (Exodus 12:29). This young man's tomb has been found and a record of his achievements, showing him to have been a great general and administrator. But his name does not appear in the list of the Pharaohs and the inscription on his tomb shows that he never became king, but died suddenly, while still only a prince. The Bible tells us how he died. It was on the night when the angel slew the firstborn. Menephthah, as we know by the Bible narrative, pursued the Hebrews. He had no son now to take command as on former occasions. He was then an old man eighty-two years of age. What more likely than that, when he saw the Israelites descend into the Red Sea, he should send on his army and stay behind himself, not caring at his age and at night, to undertake so perilous a journey. The Egyptian records state that once before, on the eve of battle, when he should have led his army, the old man had a convenient vision, ordering him not to enter the battle but to give the command to his son. He doubtless excused himself on this occasion and so saved his life. A parallel case of a father and son reigning simultaneously is found in Belshazzar who, though exercising kingly functions does not appear on the list of kings. He was associated in government with his father Nabonidus and, like Seti in Egypt, died before his father.
Frequently asked questions and answers:
Question 91: Were the patriarchs really as old as the Bible record states?
Answer:
Some of the "higher critics" claim that the ancient calendar of the antediluvians made the year really a month or lunar period. Others, with somewhat more reason, assert that a year was a season of growth equal to three of our months. Hensler and Hufeland, two German authorities, claim that the patriarchal year was three months until Abraham's time, eight months until Joseph's time and thereafter twelve months. One eminent Bible scholar has pointed out that if we accept the monthly year theory, Mahalalel’s sixty-five years before the birth of his son Jared would make him a parent at five years and three months of our reckoning; Enoch would be the same age when his son Methuselah was born and the ages of the other patriarchs at the birth of their children would be equally preposterous. Of course, such conclusions absolutely condemn the monthly year theory. Conditions among the antediluvians were totally different from those after the Flood. There had been no rain and the sun and planets were not visible; in the moist atmosphere, growth was greatly stimulated and all natural conditions tended to animal and vegetable longevity, precisely as the Bible indicates. Besides, as that period produced animal types of giant proportions, created for strength and endurance, the analogy of nature would seem to demand that man should bear some harmonious proportion to his surroundings. Genesis 6 clearly implies this. Age and stature, not only human but otherwise, became greatly diminished after the Flood.
Thought for Today: Wednesday January 15
Our influence on society depends on our likeness to our Saviour Yeshua. We cannot elevate others higher than we ourselves have gone. The first century believers out-thought, out-lived and out-loved their neighbours, and by their example of purity and compassion attracted countless thousands to the faith in Moshiach. SO -- What do others see in your life that would attract them to our Moshiach?
Now there arose a new king over Egypt, who did not know Joseph.
#exodus 1:8 #shemot
[And then almost 2000 years later, there arose a new Bishop of the Gentile Church who did not know #yeshua. ?]
Could the new pharaoh who didn't know Joseph have been a Hyksos? Or was Joseph's pharaoh a Hyksos and the new Pharaoh a native Egyptian? Nobody knows for sure, but the change of dynasties in Egypt was definitely related to the change in attitude toward the Hebrews.
This is one of the topics discussed with Dr. Petrovich in this video.
https://rumble.com/v5wmfmt-the....-hebrews-in-egypt-wi
ISRAELI PRIESTS HAVE NOT PROPERLY MADE KNOWN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN UNCLEAN AND CLEAN CREATURES – EZEKIEL 22:26
Genesis and Exodus are full of thematic parallels with other parts of the Bible. Check out these connections between the stories of Jacob and Laban ( #genesis ) and Israel and Egypt ( #exodus ):
Jacob | Moses
Laban | Egypt
Daughters and children | People of Israel
Sheep | Plunder
Laban's idols | Golden calf
River | Sea
Covenant | Covenant
#biblepatterns
https://soilfromstone.blogspot.....com/2018/11/themati
Here are some Apostolic passages you might want to study alongside #torah parsha #shmot ("Names", #exodus 1:1-6:1), plus some related commentary and videos: https://www.americantorah.com/....2021/02/18/parsha-sh
Notice: The T&Cs for TTN has just been updated (14 Jan 2025) to include a section for Child Safety as required for external compliance.
The additions below were added under the section: User Content
The material complies with all applicable child safety laws and regulations, including the Child Safety Act. This means that the material:
- Does not exploit, harm, or endanger minors in any way.
- Does not include or promote content that depicts or encourages abuse, exploitation, or inappropriate interactions with minors.
- Does not solicit personal information or interactions from individuals under the age of 18 without appropriate consent and safeguards.
- Is compliant with all laws governing the protection of children, including but not limited to restrictions on the collection, use, and disclosure of information from minors.