Mid-week herhaling: day 4 (wednesday) 15 may / dag 4 (woensdag) 15 mei 2024
This entire program is repeated the following morning at 09:00 / Hierdie volledige program word die volgende oggend om 09:00 herhaal

Neem kennis dat tye volgens SAST aangedui word

18:00: Liefde wat verder gaan – John Wahl
18:35: Vrug dra (12) – Gerrie Coetzee (11)
19:30: Parasha Q’doshim – Leo du Toit
Email/Epos: theway146@mailfence.com
Web: www.silvertrumpet.life

Uitsaaiskakels:
Zeno: www.zeno.fm/silver-trumpet or the free Zeno app
Radio.net: https://www.radio.net/s/silvertrumpetradio
hearthis: https://hearthis.at/silver-trumpet/live/

On this date in history, 05/15/1781: British capture Fort Granby, South Carolina. #otd #tdih https://www.historycarper.com/....1821/11/17/francis-m

WORD FOR TODAY “WHO DO YOU OBEY”: Act 5:29 Kefa and the other emissaries answered, "We must obey God, not men.

VERSE FOR TODAY: Pro 7:2 Keep my commandments and live, And my teaching as the apple of your eye.

Positive frequencies spoken out loud hourly.

www.BGMCTV.org

Psalm 83:2 — 3, “See how Your enemies rage, how Your foes have reared their heads. With cunning they scheme against Your people and conspire against those You cherish.” Some try to make this psalm about the political nation of Israel but it is more about the people than a political or geographic country. This reminds us that there are evil and wicked people who will do everything they are capable of to destroy anyone who proclaims our Creator as God of gods and King of kings.

It appears some on the left, and others, are already misconstruing information about HB 6090. The ACLU have even described it as dangerous to the first amendment. I suppose when the ACLU refused to defend my first amendment rights I lost some faith in them, however their continued actions, in this case, seeming bold face lies, haven't done them any favors.

What do you think?

The full text can be found at https://www.congress.gov/bill/....118th-congress/house

Section 5, the implemented portion:
In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individual’s actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Department’s assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent.

It is limited by the civil rights act, and wants to make sure that discriminating against someone for being or appearing Jewish is taken into consideration. And that's bad, how? That's different from the protections of any other ethnic group, how?

Section 6 is the part that determines how it would be implemented

(a) General Rule Of Construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed—

(1) to expand the authority of the Secretary of Education;

(2) to alter the standards pursuant to which the Department of Education makes a determination that harassing conduct amounts to actionable discrimination; or

(3) to diminish or infringe upon the rights protected under any other provision of law that is in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act.

(b) Constitutional Protections.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.


I guess I'm not seeing how something that (legally) must not be interpreted to expand or change the authority of education, and that must not be interpreted to infringe on any first amendment rights, might be dangerous to the first amendment, or college campuses? It sounds like the ACLU, and (some) others on the left, are upset that cannot practice antisemitism as unchallenged as they might once have, or wish to do. If you replaced "Jewish" with "black" or "gay" I bet they would call the bill too weak, toothless even, since it provides no actual new enforcement authority. Just consideration of an (arguably already protected) category when looking at acts of discrimination already protected under the civil rights act.

Here is an ACLU press release, https://www.aclu.org/press-rel....eases/aclu-condemns- While I do agree that the courts already agree that college campuses are no different, and that passing a (effectively toothless/posturing) bill is pretty much moot, I feel compelled to point out their false stance that it stifles free speech regarding Israel. Nowhere does the bill even mention that topic, a seemingly bold faced lie not reflected in the bill they appear to condemn.

Q141: What was the name of Abraham's second wife (not concubine)?

#quiz

PS: Discussions are very welcome, but please do not give the answer away in your discussions.

Hint: Gen. 25

Omer #
???????
???????
????

"I will kill her children with death, and all the Churches shall know that I am he which searcheth the reins and hearts: and I will give unto every one of you according unto your works."

Re 2

Thought for Today: Wednesday May 15

We can do great things if we focus on our great YHVH Who created us! And remember, He multiplies the blessings you give to others, then He brings them back to you.