I wear tzizitziot with a blue cord when I leave the house because I understand the command to wear them is blanket for men, women and children. However, I cant find depictions of hebrew women or children wearing them in Egyptian art. The one depiction that includes women and children does not have the men wearing them, either. The art with men wearing them interestingly has them wearing 3 tassles per corner (one for each tribe?) Can someone better versed in ancient hebrew please clarify for me if it is gender and age specific, or if it is a blanket command? Thank you!
http://TorahTent.com
Even though anyone can add links to the directory, I have been visiting websites and YouTube channels to guard against ministries that are unreasonable toward people or do not teach the truth from being added. I also know of some assemblies I have attended personally that I won't allow to be added. We need to support the sheep, not the goats. I am aware of fellowships where the pastor forced his way in to become pastor and is a goat and deceiver. Scripture warns against these kind of people. We need to be aware of who they are.
https://torahtent.com/Omer2025.php
Today is the twenty-sixth day, totaling three weeks and five days of the Omer.
Q: A priest may defile himself by burying his parent, child, or sibling, but not his wife. (Leviticus 21:1-4) Why is this?
A: After death, a parent remains a parent and a child remains a child or else Father Abraham wouldn't be our father. But death severs the covenant of marriage. The priest will miss his wife, mourn her, still love her even, but she won't be his wife.
The teachings of Paul and Yeshua on marriage and death were based in part on this passage, which is explicitly about death and burial but also implies that marriage ends at death. Ultimately all of Paul's and Yeshua's teachings were based on #torah.
raphaelmalachi
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?
Rhy Bezuidenhout
Mark and I were just talking of gender specific laws in another post- https://social.ttn.place/post/55160&ref=16385
I think I see a pattern when it comes to the laws, but still need feedback whether my observation is correct:
1- If a law prohibits something between two people and the sin is on both of them then the law is only given from the male perspective.
2 - When a law is specific to a person and the burden of breaking it is on themselves then no gender is mentioned in the law.
The tzitzit law could be a tiebreaker in my observation as the law was given to men, but is it a sin not to wear it as that would then mean that my observation still holds water.
On the other hand, so it circumcision. Some want to make female circumcision a requirement, but this law was given to the men.
If we look at the commandment itself:
“Speak to the children of Israel and tell them to make for themselves fringes (tzitzit) on the corners of their garments throughout their generations... and you shall look upon it and remember all the commandments of the LORD…” — Numbers 15:38–39
Key Hebrew phrasing:
“דַּבֵּר אֶל בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל” – "Speak to the sons of Israel"
This wording (בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל) has traditionally been interpreted to refer specifically to men.
So in my view, it comes down to personal interpretation of the verse.
Delete Comment
Are you sure that you want to delete this comment ?